02084nas a2200277   4500008004100000245007100041210006800112260001400180300001300194490000700207520126600214653001201480653001801492653001601510653001201526653003301538653002801571653002201599653002801621653001401649653002701663653002401690100002001714700002401734856004801758       2005                        eng d00aPhylogeny of Ephemeroptera (mayflies) based on molecular evidence.0 aPhylogeny of Ephemeroptera mayflies based on molecular evidence  c2005/12//  a625 - 430 v373 aThis study represents the first molecular phylogeny for the Order Ephemeroptera. The analyses included 31 of the 37 families, representing approximately 24% of the genera. Fifteen families were supported as being monophyletic, five families were supported as nonmonophyletic, and 11 families were only represented by one species, and monophyly was not testable. The suborders Furcatergalia and Carapacea were supported as monophyletic while Setisura and Pisciforma were not supported as monophyletic. The superfamilies Ephemerelloidea and Caenoidea were supported as monophyletic while Baetoidea, Siphlonuroidea, Ephemeroidea, and Heptagenioidea were not. Baetidae was recovered as sister to the remaining clades. The mayfly gill to wing origin hypothesis was not supported nor refuted by these data. Mandibular tusks were supported as having at least one loss in Behningiidae and, together with the burrowing lifestyle, possibly two origins. The fishlike body form was supported as plesiomorphic for mayflies with multiple secondary losses. Topological sensitivity analysis was used as a tool to examine patterns concerning the stability of relationships across a parameter landscape, providing additional information that may not have been acquired otherwise.10aAnimals10aBase Sequence10aDNA Primers10aInsects10aInsects: anatomy & histology10aInsects: classification10aInsects: genetics10aMolecular Sequence Data10aPHYLOGENY10aSequence Analysis, DNA10aSpecies Specificity1 aOgden, Heath, T1 aWhiting, Michael, F  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1621437502714nas a2200205   4500008004100000245012300041210006900164260001400233300001400247490000700261520205400268653001202322653001802334653001402352100001902366700002002385700002102405700002402426856005802450       2008                        eng d00aMolecules, morphology and fossils: a comprehensive approach to odonate phylogeny and the evolution of the odonate wing0 aMolecules morphology and fossils a comprehensive approach to odo  c2008/08//  a477 - 5140 v243 aWe undertook a comprehensive morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of dragonfly phylogeny, examining both extant and fossil lineages in simultaneous analyses. The legitimacy of higher-level family groups and the phylogenetic relationship between families were tested. Thirteen families were supported as monophyletic (Aeshnidae, Calopterygidae, Chlorocyphidae, Euphaeidae, Gomphidae, Isostictidae, Lestidae, Libellulidae, Petaluridae, Platystictidae, Polythoridae, Pseudostigmatidae and Synthemistidae) and eight as non-monophyletic (Amphipterygidae, Coenagrionidae, Corduliidae, Megapodagrionidae, Protoneuridae and Synlestidae), although Perilestidae and Platycnemididae were recovered as monophyletic under Bayesian analyses. Nine families were represented by one species, thus monophyly was not tested (Epiophlebiidae, Austropetaliidae, Chlorogomphidae, Cordulegastridae, Macromiidae, Chorismagrionidae, Diphlebiidae, Lestoideidae and Pseudolestidae). Epiprocta and Zygoptera were recovered as monophyletic. Ditaxinerua is supported as the sister lineage to Odonata, Epiophlebiidae and the lestid-like damselflies are sister to the Epiprocta and Zygoptera, respectively. Austropetaliidae + Aeshnidae is the sister lineage to the remaining Anisoptera. Tarsophlebia_fs placement as sister to Epiprocta or as sister to Epiprocta + Zygoptera was not resolved. Refinements are made to the current classification. Fossil taxa did not seem to provide signals crucial to recovering a robust phylogeny, but were critical to understanding the evolution of key morphological features associated with flight. Characters associated with wing structure were optimized revealing two wing character complexes: the pterostigma-nodal brace complex and the costal wing base & costal-ScP junction complex. In turn, these two complexes appear to be associated; the pterostigma.nodal brace complex allowing for further modification of the wing characters comprised within the costal wing base & costal.ScP junction complex leading the modern odonate wing.10aODONATA10aPALAEONTOLOGY10aPHYLOGENY1 aBybee, Seth, M1 aOgden, Heath, T1 aBranham, Marc, A1 aWhiting, Michael, F  uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00191.x